Conduct of Operations
Draft 2/9/2006
FUNCTIONAL AREA GOAL: A high
level of performance in DOE operations is accomplished by
establishment of high operating standards by management, by
communicating operating standards to the working level, by
providing sufficient resources to the operations department,
by ensuring personnel are well trained, by closely monitoring
performance in operations, and by holding workers and their
supervisors accountable for their performance in conducting
activities.
REQUIREMENTS:
- DOE O 5480.19 Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE
Facilities
- 10 CFR 830.120, Quality Assurance Requirements for DOE
Nuclear Facilities
GUIDANCE:
- ANSI/ASME NQA-1, Quality Assurance Program Requirements
for Nuclear Facilities
- IAEA Draft Standard - Conduct of Operations at Nuclear
Facilities
Performance Objective 1: Contractor Program
Documentation:
Effective implementation and control of operating
activities are primarily achieved by establishing written
standards in operations
- A conduct of operations program has been established to
implement DOE 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements
for DOE Facilities.
- Procedures or other definitive documentation specify
policies that are to be applied for operations, including
goals and the means to achieve those
goals.
- Operating Procedures provide for the types of controls
necessary to implement policies.
- Operations procedures support facility and DOE guidance
for operations. Responsibilities for implementing these
policies, including the responsibility of shift personnel,
if applicable, should be clearly defined.
- Safety, Environment, and Operating goals should be used
as a management tool for involving cognizant groups or
individuals in improving operating performance and for
measuring operating effectiveness. Goals should be
auditable, measurable, realistic, and challenging.
Operations goals in areas such-as the following should be
established:
- minimizing the unavailability of safety systems;
- minimizing personnel errors;
- As-Low-As Reasonably-Achievable (ALARA);
- minimizing lost facility capability;
- minimizing the number of unscheduled facility
shutdowns per year;
- timely completion of scheduled surveillance;
- minimizing the amount of overtime;
- achieving and maintaining complete staffing and
training of shift positions;
- minimizing waste; and
- minimizing the number of lighted annunciators.
- Facility guidance exist which describes safety
preplanning requirements for all operational activities. The
guidance explains the role of safety analysis
reviews,
job safety analyses, and the handling of safety
matters.
- Standards for the professional conduct of operations
personnel have been be established so that operator
performance meets the expectations of DOE and facility
management.
- Facility guidance exists that describes safety
preplanning requirements for all operational activities.
Suggested
Lines of Inquiry and Review Approach
Performance Objective 2: Contractor Program
Implementation
The organization has implemented a program
that ensures that Conduct of Operations requirements are
incorporated into line activities.
2.1 Shift Routines and Operating Practices:
The manner in which operations are directed ensure that a
high level of ES&H performance in facility operations is
achieved through effective implementation and control of
operations activities that have the potential to impact worker
safety and health, the environment, and public
welfare.
- Operator knowledge and performance support
safe and reliable operation of the equipment and systems for
which they are responsible.
- Workers and their supervisors are held
accountable for safety performance on the
job.
- Operations personnel adhere to the requirements of the
facility industrial safety program.
- Operator tours are of sufficient detail to ensure that
the facility safety status is known. Each operator conducts
a thorough tour of all areas within his/her responsibility,
making appropriate equipment inspections at designated times
at least once per shift. Plant security concerns do not
override operator safety assessment duties.
- Tour inspection sheets are utilized for
providing guidance on the extent to which equipment and
areas should be inspected during routine
tours.
- Written materials and entertainment devices
(such as radios, televisions, tape players, and computer
games) not related to job duties are prohibited from use by
on-duty personnel in order to minimize distractions from
their responsibilities which may lead to unsafe
conditions.
- Narrative logs are established at all key
shift positions.
- Supervisory positions have and use a
turnover checklist in the turnover process that is designed
to transfer vital information that may impact safety, system
status, events, etc.
- The organization has a process in place to
identify, route, and maintain a required reading system of
applicable memos, technical reports, and other pertinent
operations, training, and industrial safety information to
supervisors and operators.
- A required reading file established
and used in a manner that ensures that appropriate
individuals are made aware of important information that is
related to job assignments, including information on worker
safety and health, the environment, and the public
welfare.
- An operator aid program is established to
ensure that operator aids are posted and that they are
current, correct, and useful.
Suggested
Lines of Inquiry and Review Approach
2.2 Investigation of Abnormal Events:
Abnormal events are investigated to ensure that
facility events are thoroughly investigated to assess the
impact of the event on facility operations, worker safety and
health, the environment, and public welfare
- Investigations determine the root cause of
the event, ascertain whether the event is reportable, and
identify corrective actions to prevent recurrence of the
event.
- The organization monitors, documents, and
evaluates safety problems. Based on assessments of these
problems, corrective actions are taken to improve safety
performance.
- Events that occur in the facility and adversely affect
the safety of personnel and the environment receive a
thorough investigation.
- If an act of sabotage is discovered or
suspected, is it immediately investigated to:
- Determine condition of affected systems
and operability of safety systems;
- Make decisions on continued operation or
safe shutdown;
- Minimize the impact of discovered acts of
sabotage and deter future acts of
sabotage?
- Shift personnel are required to notify
off-shift management and supervisors of off-normal events
and emergencies.
- Operators are knowledgeable about aspects
of facility safety that affect operation and are able to
analyze off-normal situations and take appropriate action to
correct the causes(s) of problems.
Suggested
Lines of Inquiry and Review Approach
2.3 Control of Equipment and System Status:
Operating practices ensure that the facility configuration
is consistent with design requirements and that the on-duty
personnel know the status of equipment and systems.
- Managers and supervisors ensure that only
trained and authorized personnel operate equipment regulated
by safety standards (i.e., cranes, forklifts, construction
vehicles, etc.)
- Equipment deficiencies are noted by facility operating
personnel and identified in the work control system for
correction.
- An equipment-labeling program, which conforms to
national standards
established and maintained to ensure
that facility personnel are able to properly identify
facility systems and equipment.
- A labeling program is in place that helps ensure that
facility personnel are able to positively identify equipment
and materials they handle.
- Are systems in place to ensure that duty position
turnovers provide oncoming
operators with an accurate
picture of facility status.
Suggested
Lines of Inquiry and Review Approach
2.4 Lockout and Tagout & Independent
Verification:
- Locks and tags are placed on controls when
for safety or other special administrative reasons controls
must be established.
- When there is the potential for equipment damage or
injury during equipment
operations, servicing,
maintenance, or modification activities due to inadvertent
activation of equipment, does the facility lockout/tagout
program protect personnel from injury, protect equipment
from damage, maintain the operability of plant systems, and
maintain the integrity of the physical boundaries of plant
systems?
- Does the independent verification program ensure correct
facility operation and the correct position of components
such as valves, switches, and circuit breakers?
Suggested
Lines of Inquiry and Review Approach
2.5 Operations Procedures
- The organization has approved procedures or
other definitive documentation that specifies policies that
are to be applied for operations.
- Methods for developing new safety-related procedures and
for procedure formats are clearly defined.
- The content of safety-related procedures conforms to
prescribed guidelines.
- The organization has an adequate approval and review
process for procedure development and revision.
Suggested
Lines of Inquiry and Review Approach
2.6 Communications: Methods are
in place and implemented to ensure that all facility personnel
are promptly alerted to facility emergencies.
- Systems in place for the notification of
DOE and other agencies of abnormal
events ensure timely
notification and thus maximize facility responsibleness
to
public health and safety concerns?
- Use of the facility public address system
(page) is administratively controlled to ensure it retains
its effectiveness in contacting plant
personnel.
- Methods are implemented to ensure that
control areas can quickly contact on-shift operators or
supervisors.
- Radio usage is not allowed in areas where
electronic interference with plant equipment may
result.
- The organization utilizes standardized
terminology and abbreviations during communications about
facility operations.
- A management system has been established to communicate
short-term information and administrative instructions
("operator orders") to facility personnel.
Suggested
Lines of Inquiry and Review Approach
Performance Objective 3: DOE Line Management
Oversight
- DOE has established and implemented a program that
verifies that the contractor's organizations have effective
policy/guidance for implementation of a Conduct of
Operations Program.
- The oversight organization has identified the scope and
is aware of the status of Conduct of Operations at the
facility.
- The oversight organization is staffed to support Conduct
of Operations.
- The oversight organization follows written procedures
that define the organization's oversight of the Conduct of
Operations implementation processes.
- The oversight organization's process notifies the
responsible line management of deficiencies found and
documents those deficiencies in a tracking system that
ensures corrective actions are taken.
- The oversight organization processes trend deficiencies
and uses these trends to help improve implementation of
Conduct of Operations at the facility.
- DOE field office representatives are involved in a
day-to-day oversight of facility safety and OSH activities.
Suggested
Lines of Inquiry and Review Approach
< BACK TO PREVIOUS PAGE